The Indian economy and society today face enormous challenges in the water
sector. Water demands of our fast industrialising economy and urbanizing society are
steeply increasing, but the potential for augmenting supply is limited, ground-water
tables are rapidly falling and water quality issues are increasingly getting critical.
Climate change poses new but serious challenges with its impacts on the Nature's
hydrologic cycle. More extreme rates of precipitation and evapo-transpiration will
worsen the impacts of floods and droughts. lt is no wonder then that conflicts across
competing uses and users of water are growing with passing of every day. These
challenges can only be met through a paradigm shift in the management of water
resources in India. The National Water Policy should obviously come out with clinical
diagnosis of the problems and the correct remedial policy prescriptions along with
timeframe for implementation. Further, the nature and magnitude of water challenges,
that we have already started facing and will eventually become further severe in coming
days, also call for innovative and out of box solutions.
lnnovations hold the key
The National Water Policy should encourage such innovations in water sector
which focus on finding affordable solutions for the needs of people with no sacrifice of
quality of life or economic output. lnnovation can play a key role in not only driving
growth and competitive advantage, but also ensuring that this development becomes
socially inclusive as well as economically and environmentally sustainable. Proactive
States need to be incentivized in order to ensure that the nation's resources are utilized
optimally and efficiently. Here, I would like to mention a few such innovative initiatives,
which can be suitably extended and improvised further.
1) More than water demand management; the water management is going to be very
crucial issue in coming years. ln order to meet with the burgeoning water demands, we
need to prepare water management experts. Necessary education and training needs to
be incorporated in the curriculum, and also it is to be ensured that when these experts
pass out from the universities, they are offered appropriate job opportunities. This would 98
serve as an incentive for students to take up the course for water management and the
nation would benefit by infusing young talent in this field. The policy should incorporate
this aspect so that it gets focused attention from all concerned.
2) Another aspect for which I would like to invlte attention of this august body is the
necessity to promote desalination in a big way. Our country has got about 4000 km long
coast line. Why can't we think of utilizing saline water from sea by desalinization
technology and other options as well? This will help ameliorate water availability,
especially in the coastal area. To make desalination more effective, economy of scale is
required as it seems to be an expensive affair. However, if the value of some other
outputs such as sodium, potassium and magnesium is taken into account, it may turn
out to be affordable. Another way of utilizing sea water is to blend it with potable water in
required proportion so as to make such blended water fit for agriculture/ irrigation. ln
order to boost this technology, there is a need to provide appropriate incentives for
innovations, so that desalination becomes affordable. Draft Water Policy should include
this aspect also.
3) Recent experiments have shown some possibility of generation of water from the wind
through wind mills. Though this is an emerging technology, further innovations are
necessary. The policy should encourage such innovations because this will address
twin-problems of electric power supply and water supply, especially for villages.
4) Rain water Harvesting and recycling of water is another area which can help augment
the available water resources. Not only should these be made mandatory but, the policy
should also stipulate certain percentages for such mandatory recycling of water for major
cities as well as for industrial and commercial units which are the bulk users of water.
5) Natural replenishment of ground water reservoir is slow and is unable to keep pace with
the excessive continued exploitation of ground water resources in various parts of the
country. Magnitude of ground water exploitation with sub optimal planning has resulted
in creating deleterious effects in terms of ground water depletion and quality
deterioration. Augmentation of ground water reservoir through Managed Aquifer
Recharge (MAR) offers a positive approach to overcome the problems of ground water
scarcity. The Water Policy should have necessary provision for MAR.
6) Solar energy is another emerging technology and is very relevant in our country, where
sun light is available in abundance and throughout the year. lf the solar panels are laid
all along the canals, dual purposes of nearly eliminating water-loss due to evaporation
from the open canal as well as generation of solar energy without acquiring any land can
be served. Gujarat has endeavoured this on pilot basis on one of the branch canals of
Sardar Sarovar Project and the results are encouraging. This can be replicated
elsewhere in the country on a large scale. However for its successful introduction;
Government of lndia should provide financial assistance. This also needs to be
incorporated as policy prescription in the draft water policy.
7) lt is well known that open canal system causes heavy water loss through evaporation
besides occupying a vast chunk of irrigable land. Further; the cost of acquisition of land
and the time lost in the procedure is the major hindrance in the progress of canals.
Laying of underground pipelines, wherever technically feasible, can be a better option to
resolve all these issues. However, in order to give a big push, Government of lndia
needs to provide financial assistance in view of the initial capital investment. The
Government of Gujarat has already initiated actions in this regard for Sardar Sarovar
Project command area. This aspect should also be addressed in our water policy
document.
8) Demand side management also needs to be considered to meet with limited availability
of water. Since, agriculture has a major share in total water use, there is an urgent need
to promote research for new seed varieties that would require less water for growth and
are also more water-stress resistant. The Water Policy should address this aspect suitably.
Need to revisit the Policy framed l0 years ago:
I would, like to bring out certain important and very relevant provisions as
contained in the National Water Policy 2002, which do not find place in the draft Policy
2012. These are:
1) Draft Water Policy 2012 is silent about defining the priorities for water allocation which
were clearly stipulated in National Water Policy 2002. The Water Policy should include
this to serve as general guidance.
2) Provisions made for encouraging execution of water resources projects, benefitting the
tribal and weaker sections of the society are missing in the draft Policy 2012. These
need to be reconsidered for inclusion.
3) Provision for water zoning of the country is aIso not found in the draft Policy 2012.
Economic development and allied activities including agricultural, industrial and urban
development, should be planned with due regard to the constraints imposed by the
configuration of water availability.
4) As laid down in National Water Policy 2002 the provision for enacting the Dam safety
legislation may be continued to ensure proper inspection, maintenance and surveillance
of existing dams and also to ensure proper planning, investigation, design and
construction for safety of new dams.
Ground Water: Need to Consult the Stakeholders
The draft water policy tends to suggest for Government regulation of wells and
their use which is highly sensitive and needs a cautious approach since it is concerning
to our millions of farmers. There are more than 100 million agriculture land holdings in
our country out of which small and marginal farmers, together, constitute about 80
percent of total holdings and their average is less than one hectare of land. Besides, the
irrigation cover can at best be provided for about 60 percent of total cultivable area at
national level. Further, the idea of considering water as community managed resource
may seem to be very good; but its implementation may pose a number of
unprecedented legal complexities. ln this regard, we need to consider two-pronged
strategy comprising of preventive measures framework and regulatory measures
framework, especially for industrial and commercial use of ground water. Also, it would
be prudent for the Policy makers to take a broader view and consult the farmers, and
other stake-holders extensively before coming to any conclusion.
Other Important Aspects
a) The Draft Policy also proposes for releasing certain amount of water for ecological
purposes. This is definitely a welcome step. However, in existing schemes, it would be
very difficult to do so at the cost of various established water uses. Looking to the
practicalities of implementation, it seems appropriate to consider this provision only for
projects to be taken up henceforth. Also, it would be prudent for the Policy makers to
consult the farmers, and other stake-holders before coming to any conclusion in this
regard.
b) The Draft Policy 2012 touches upon the aspect of interlinking of rivers very cursorily. The
fact is that the Ministry of Water Resources had formulated a National Perspective plan
for water resources development by transferring water from water-surplus basins to
water-deficit basins / regions by interlinking of rivers as early as in 1980 and this scheme
of interlinking of rivers was approved with two components viz. Himalayan rivers and
Peninsular rivers. As the population is growing and the availability of water is dwindling,
there is an urgent need to transfer water from water-surplus to the deficient areas. 32
years later, the policy should now spell out concrete steps to be taken and draw up a
time-bound action plan rather than skirting this issue of vital national importance.
c) The draft Policy talks about pari-passu planning and execution of all components of a
water resource project. Here, I would like to emphasize upon the need for simplification
of procedures for Forest and Environment clearance; Land Acquisition procedures and
the procedures for getting clearance from Railways & National Highways Authorities for enabling pari-passu execution. The Policy must clearly spell out about effecting changes in Land Acquisition Act and Guidelines for Forest and Environment Clearances along with the mechanism for the single window clearance with time capping for issuance of requisite clearance / approval.
d) As was rightly mentioned in National water policy 2002, the states find it difficult to fund
the maintenance of water resource schemes which is under non-plan budget. Therefore,
a centrally funded scheme or a National Corpus fund needs to be devised / created to
help the States undertake properly the maintenance or upkeep of water resources
schemes.
e) Water disputes between the states are governed by the provisions of lnter State water
Disputes Act, 1956, which was amended in the year 2002. It is our common knowledge
and experience that, the Tribunals appointed for the purpose take years to come to any
conclusion. Further, the award of the Tribunal is challenged by the aggrieved party
resulting in further delay. Keeping this in view, the Sarkaria Commission on Center-State
relationship has also recommended making necessary amendments in this Act including
for fixing the time-limit for the settlement of such disputes by the Tribunals. The National
Water .Policy should consider this recommendation of amending our existing legal
framework / statutes so as to ensure that the inter-state water disputes are not suffering
from undue delay and are settled timely.
d) As was rightly mentioned in National water policy 2002, the states find it difficult to fund
the maintenance of water resource schemes which is under non-plan budget. Therefore,
a centrally funded scheme or a National Corpus fund needs to be devised / created to
help the States undertake properly the maintenance or upkeep of water resources
schemes.
e) Water disputes between the states are governed by the provisions of lnter State water
Disputes Act, 1956, which was amended in the year 2002. It is our common knowledge
and experience that, the Tribunals appointed for the purpose take years to come to any
conclusion. Further, the award of the Tribunal is challenged by the aggrieved party
resulting in further delay. Keeping this in view, the Sarkaria Commission on Center-State
relationship has also recommended making necessary amendments in this Act including
for fixing the time-limit for the settlement of such disputes by the Tribunals. The National
Water .Policy should consider this recommendation of amending our existing legal
framework / statutes so as to ensure that the inter-state water disputes are not suffering
from undue delay and are settled timely.
No comments:
Post a Comment